Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0359619960080020234
Journal of Korean Knee Society
1996 Volume.8 No. 2 p.234 ~ p.239
Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction with BPTB Allograft and BPTB Autograft in 23 Cases (A Preliminary Report)
Á¶À翵
ÀÌÁøÈ«/ÀüÀç±Õ/¹è»ó¿ø/À±¼®Çö
Abstract
Although there have been various treatment methods for ruptured ACL from the consevative care to the reconstructive surgery, arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with bne patella tendon bone graft has been gold standard technique. It has been reported
that clinical results of autograft and allograft for ACL reconstruction were about the same. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results after a4rthroscopic ACL reconstruction with BPTB allograft(Group 1 : 12 cases) and BPTB autograft
(Group 2: 11 cases).
Average duration of follow up was 12 months(Group 1 : 12 months, Group 2 : 11 months). The linical results were evaluated by IKDC ligament standard evaluation form, KT 2000TM knee ligament ARTHROMETER and analyzed with Mann- Whitney U test.
Clinical result of harvest sight pathology showed clear statistical difference (P(0.05). But other clinical results did not show obviousstatistical difference between Group 1 and Group 2. We think that these above mentioned results are due to a short term
follow up. But higher rate of ligament laxity was shown in the ligament evaluation, such as anterior translation more than 5mm, occurred in 3 cases of allograft group (35%).
We know that longer duration of follow up should be necessary to obtain the more meaningful clinical results, and we will report again because it is preliminary study.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø